If you’re one of the readers of this blog who has ever asked me for technical advice, then this post is for you. Microsoft, next month, is releasing Vista, the next version of its operating system series, Windows. Vista has been touted as the next big thing from Microsoft. Its big already. Its a rhinoceros. Its horned, its blind, and its dumb – and it wants to take over your computer. After doing some reading and some research I can’t recommend anyone upgrade from Windows 2000 or Windows XP to Windows Vista. Windows Vista is advertised as a Porsche, but instead delivers the performance of a 1980’s Ford Taurus. Which to bring things into a more feminine perspective would be like being advertised marble counters but arriving to find painted countertops.
Windows Vista will require a degrading of performance because everything that is multi-media based will have to be reduced in quality. If you get a Blu-Ray disc and are excited to watch that blu-ray movie on your home computer on your flat pannel hi-def monitor – forget it. The quality will be degraded in an attempt at keeping the Digital Rights (as in you don’t have any) Managed. All sorts of encryption goes on within the processes of Windows Vista so that the data can be ‘protected’. To clarify about encryption think of it this way: your computer processes become slower because data has to be encrypted [modified to not represent itself plainly], sent somewhere else on the comuter, decrypted [modified to represent itself plainly again] and then possibly sent back in another encryptiong/decryption process. That means that the computer you have now will have to work harder just to get the same things done in Windows Vista that it has been doing in Windows XP or 2000.
Furthermore Microsoft can revoke a driver at any time which means that you could run a Windows Update to patch any number of security holes and then suddenly find yourself the proud owner of something that doesn’t work because Microsoft also slipped in a ‘patch’ that made the hardware you’re using not work because they ‘revoked’ support for it. Nice.
As a Non-Fear and Uncertainty guy I do want to add this: A new computer that ships with Vista will more than likely handle all of the things I’ve described above just fine. But know that the manufacturers are going to work hard to sell you on ‘Intel Inside’ or any number of other features that maks you think that the computer is powerful, but running Windows Vista will mean that you won’t get as much power out of it as you would running an older version of Windows or possibly a flavor of Linux [I recommend ubuntu]. Don’t be afraid of Vista, but be aware that your choice to upgrade on a current computer could be annoying and bring an older machine that’s barely Windows Vista compatible to its knees.
The one other thing to be aware of is that Windows Vista is reported to have a huge number of ‘confirmation boxes’. Those are boxes that pop up and ask if you want to do something, then ask again just in case, “Do you really, really, really want to do that?” Every review I’ve read has mentioned this. Be forewarned 🙂
But otherwise, if you’ve got a great graphics card and a monster machine, you should be able to have a pleasant Windows Vista experience 🙂 I just wouldn’t call it an upgrade. The best single-source review of Vista for computer owners is here. Thanks to Matt for that particular link.
Update: Here’s a terrific review of Windows Vista for those looking for a good, detailed review: Windows Vista Super Site.
There’s only one way to end this foolishness; a thunderous slamming shut of wallets. Let MSFT (and Intel) know in no uncertain terms that until their ‘trusted computing’ becomes trustworthy to the user (not the RIAA and MPAA), they can keep their ‘upgrades’. Personally, W2K and Office97 work just fine for me, and I’m not interested in turning my computer into a ‘content appliance’.
MW
Randy, while Peter Gutmann is certainly a competent and well respected figure in computer security. It is as unwise to take his words at face value as it is to take Microsoft’s marketing the same way.
The statement “Windows Vista will require a degrading of performance because *everything* that is multi-media based will have to be reduced in quality.” is plainly false. And by falling for that thinking without checking it for accuracy, you perpetuate the same Fear and Uncertainty that you strive to avoid at the end of your post.
I never ‘upgrade’ Windows for at least 12 months after release. Hopefully, by then many of the bugs will be worked out.
Remember the old saying, “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.”
The best option to buy a Mac and upgrade to Mac OS X Leopard. Why not buy the real McCoy instead of the imitation McCoy?